St John's Buildings
  • Public access
  • Contact
Book a barrister
  • People
    • Barristers
    • Management
    • Staff
  • Expertise
    • ADR
    • Business & property
      • Banking & finance
      • Commercial & chancery litigation
      • Commercial fraud
      • Company
      • Construction & property
      • Costs
      • Data & information law
      • Inheritance & trust disputes
      • Insolvency
      • Intellectual property
      • Professional negligence
      • Sport, media, & entertainment
      • Tax
    • Court of Protection
    • Crime
      • Fraud & financial crime
      • Magistrates Court
      • Crown Court & appeals
      • Courts martial & service law
    • Education law
    • Employment
    • Family
      • Family finance
      • Children (Public and Private law)
      • Private FDR
      • Family arbitration
    • Inquests & coronial
    • Personal injury & clinical negligence
      • Personal injury
      • Clinical negligence
      • Catastrophic & fatal accidents
      • Fraud
      • Costs
      • Disease
      • Travel claims
    • Public & administrative law
    • Regulatory & professional discipline
      • Environmental
      • Health & safety
      • Licensing
      • Professional discipline
      • Sport discipline
      • Trading standards & consumer
      • Transport
  • Instructing us
    • Fees
    • Terms of business
    • Covid-secure risk assessment
    • Privacy
    • Telephone call monitoring policy
    • Bar Standards Board transparency rules
    • Technology & innovation
    • Complaints procedure
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
    • Tenancy
    • Pupillage
      • Apply for pupillage
    • Third Six Pupillages
    • Mini-pupillage
      • Apply for mini-pupillage
    • Clerking & support staff
  • CSR & wellbeing
    • Our values
    • CSR policy
    • Equality policy
    • Wellbeing policy
    • Anti-racism statement
    • Reasonable adjustments policy
    • Menopause policy
  • People
    • Barristers
    • Management
    • Staff
  • Expertise
    • ADR
    • Business & property
      • Banking & finance
      • Commercial & chancery litigation
      • Commercial fraud
      • Company
      • Construction & property
      • Costs
      • Data & information law
      • Inheritance & trust disputes
      • Insolvency
      • Intellectual property
      • Professional negligence
      • Sport, media, & entertainment
      • Tax
    • Court of Protection
    • Crime
      • Fraud & financial crime
      • Magistrates Court
      • Crown Court & appeals
      • Courts martial & service law
    • Education law
    • Employment
    • Family
      • Family finance
      • Children (Public and Private law)
      • Private FDR
      • Family arbitration
    • Inquests & coronial
    • Personal injury & clinical negligence
      • Personal injury
      • Clinical negligence
      • Catastrophic & fatal accidents
      • Fraud
      • Costs
      • Disease
      • Travel claims
    • Public & administrative law
    • Regulatory & professional discipline
      • Environmental
      • Health & safety
      • Licensing
      • Professional discipline
      • Sport discipline
      • Trading standards & consumer
      • Transport
  • Instructing us
    • Fees
    • Terms of business
    • Covid-secure risk assessment
    • Privacy
    • Telephone call monitoring policy
    • Bar Standards Board transparency rules
    • Technology & innovation
    • Complaints procedure
  • News
  • Events
  • Careers
    • Tenancy
    • Pupillage
      • Apply for pupillage
    • Third Six Pupillages
    • Mini-pupillage
      • Apply for mini-pupillage
    • Clerking & support staff
  • CSR & wellbeing
    • Our values
    • CSR policy
    • Equality policy
    • Wellbeing policy
    • Anti-racism statement
    • Reasonable adjustments policy
    • Menopause policy
  • Public access
  • Contact
Manchester

News

  • Home
  • >
  • News
R v Lethbridge and Rider
6th June 2024

R v Lethbridge and Rider

Andrew O'Byrne KC and Ian Goldsack were instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service in a case of Murder and Robbery against two women, Nicola...

Read more
Re T (interim Care Order: Arrangements for Contact) [2024] EWCA Civil 469
5th June 2024

Re T (interim Care Order: Arrangements for Contact) [2024] EWCA Civil 469

Kate Burnell KC and Simon Heaney recently appeared in the Court of Appeal case of Re T (interim Care Order: Arrangements for Contact) [2024]...

Read more
R v Michael Swann
5th June 2024

R v Michael Swann

Zahra Baqri prosecuted Michael Swann who admitted taking indecent images, possession of indecent images, possession of prohibited images and three counts of making indecent...

Read more
R v Cameron Hanson
3rd June 2024

R v Cameron Hanson

David James represented a police officer for offences of Misconduct in Public Office following the distribution of videos and images from crime scenes. The...

Read more
The Rule in Polkey Explained by Romona Morgan
31st May 2024

The Rule in Polkey Explained by Romona Morgan

Our Pupil Barrister Romona Morgan has written an article offering a snapshot view of the ruling in Polkey and the approach tribunals take with...

Read more
R v Angus McBeath
20th May 2024

R v Angus McBeath

David James represented Angus McBeath, a drug dealer who was jailed for three years and nine months after admitting possessing Class B drugs with...

Read more
Romona Morgan article about the question of fiduciary duty owed by a dealer
20th May 2024

Romona Morgan article about the question of fiduciary duty owed by a dealer

Our Pupil Barrister Romona Morgan has written a review of the judgment in Johnson examining the distinction between a dealer and a broker in...

Read more
Robert Cline article about Experts in PICN Cases
17th May 2024

Robert Cline article about Experts in PICN Cases

Robert Cline has written an article about experts in Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence cases. He addresses the issues of what experts are for,...

Read more
8 Point Test on determining “substantial injustice” in Fundamental Dishonesty findings
16th May 2024

8 Point Test on determining “substantial injustice” in Fundamental Dishonesty findings

Henry Vanderpump provides a bite-size update on the High Court case of Williams-Henry -v- Associated British Ports Holdings Ltd, handed down on 10th April 2024,...

Read more
Jury at inquest find failings contributed to death of a prisoner
13th May 2024

Jury at inquest find failings contributed to death of a prisoner

David Baines represented the family of a prisoner in a six-day inquest heard at the Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen Coroner’s Court. The deceased...

Read more
Two new cases for David James
10th May 2024

Two new cases for David James

David James appeared for the lead defendant in a kidnapping prosecution. Darshan Rathoor pleaded guilty to conspiracy to kidnap and conspiracy to blackmail. He...

Read more
R v Benjamin Lewis
10th May 2024

R v Benjamin Lewis

Mark Connor prosecuted a Royal Navy officer who killed two young women in a high-speed car crash. Benjamin Lewis had been driving at up...

Read more
    1 2 3 … 70 Next
ML Awards 2023: Chambers of the YearISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems - Certified
Manchester
Manchester

24a-26 St John Street
Manchester, M3 4DJ
DX 728861 Manchester 4

Tel: 0161 214 1500

Chester
Chester

21 White Friars
Chester, CH1 1NZ
DX 19979 Chester

Tel: 01244 323070

Sheffield
Sheffield

7 Leopold Street
Sheffield, S1 2GY
DX 10565 Sheffield 1

Tel: 0114 273 8951

Liverpool
Liverpool

38 Vernon Street
Liverpool, L2 2AY
DX 14227 Liverpool

Tel: 0151 243 6000

Leeds
Leeds

Floor 3, St Paul’s House, 23 Park Square
Leeds, LS1 2ND

Tel: 0113 484 8899

St John's Buildings
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Accessibility
© St John's Buildings 2025. All rights reserved.
Barristers regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
Website by Square Eye Ltd.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experience we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}