Penelope Stanistreet

Penelope Stanistreet

Email: clerk@stjohnsbuildings.co.uk

Phone: 0114 273 8951

Year of call: 1993

Book Barrister

   Top_tier_firms   TopRanked UKBar_16_barrister

“Specialist child law expert who typically acts for parents and local authorities. She has a background in criminal as well as family law, and many of her most significant cases have concerned complex injuries and medical concerns”.

Strengths: “An oracle, she is absolutely the person you’ll go to with any query.” “Down-to-earth, tenacious and always fights clients’ corners effectively.” Chambers & Partners 2017

“A clear advocate, who brings compassion and understanding to the job.” Legal 500 2016

Pennie read Classical Civilisation at Nottingham University before undertaking the conversion course in Law at City University in 1992. She was called to the Bar by the Honourable Society of Lincoln’s Inn in 1993 having undertaken the BVC at the Inns of Court school of law. Pennie practises in all areas of law involving children. Pennie delivers training, both personally and through Chambers, to solicitors and Local Authorities on aspects of public law.

Memberships

  • Family Law Bar Association – committee member NE circuit FLBA
  • Northern Administrative Law Association
  • South Yorkshire Medico Legal Society
  • Chair South Yorkshire Family Justice Board
  • Committee member South Yorkshire Family Court Forum
  • Accredited for direct public access instructions.

Legal Directory Recommendations

“Specialist family law expert who represents local authorities and parents across all elements of Children Act applications. She is noted for her expertise in cases involving complex medical evidence and non-accidental injuries.

Strengths: “She is hard-working, compassionate and outcome-focused.” “She is very thorough, very well prepared and very good with distressed and difficult clients. She relates very well to people.” Chambers & Partners 2016

Focuses on all proceedings within children law, particularly cases that involve contentious medical evidence. She represents a diverse client base, and receives instructions from local authorities, guardians and parents.”

“She is a tough cookie in a very pleasant way. She is nice to be against in court.” “She is a solid and consistent advocate.” Chambers & Partners 2015

Expertise

  • Family - Children

    Private law

    Pennie has many years of experience of representing parents and children in disputes about where children should live and how they should spend time with the other parent. This includes finding of fact hearings when allegations are made by one or other party, complex work arrangements, differing needs of different children (including special needs and disability) and all of the complexities that make up modern life. Pennie was involved in research about cases in which one parent was seeking to relocate and has a particular interest in cases of “implacable hostility”.

    Public law

    Pennie represents Local Authorities, parents and children in all aspects of public law where the state is seeking to intervene in family life. This includes cases where children have died or been seriously injured, there has been over medicalization or factitious illness, sexual abuse, neglect and failing to protect. Pennie frequently deals with expert medical witnesses both in injury and neglect cases as well as psychologists and psychiatrists. Pennie has also significant experience in dealing with cases with an international element including the use of the Tipstaff, wardship, children being placed with family members abroad, allegations of child trafficking, rape and under-age marriage.

    Pennie is accredited by the Bar Council to undertake direct public access work and has advised and represented a number of parents in private law disputes on this basis.

    Cases

    Re AZ (Children) (Relocation to Poland) [2016] EWFC 8 Successfully represented a mother who had applied to permanently relocate to Poland with her child. The mother suffered from mental ill health. The judgment is published here.

    H v A Local Authority [2015]: Representing mother in successful application to revoke placement order. Local authority had instructed leading counsel to oppose the application by mother which was also potentially the subject of an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

    B v SCC  [2015]: The first case in Sheffield of a family member making an application for a contact who had been adopted some time ago.  Pro bono.

    F v Local Authority A and Local Authority B [2015]: Representing local authority in re-hearing following successful appeal by family. Significant mental health issues, children very disturbed, complex plans.

    A Local Authority v B & M & R [2015]: Representing a parent in a finding of fact hearing and welfare hearing. Injuries alleged but following cross-examination of both medical and factual witnesses no finding made in relation to actual injury. Child subject to rehabilitation plan following welfare hearing in spite of initial opposition from the Local Authority.

    SCC v M, P and M [2015]: Representing Local Authority in finding of fact hearing including previous allegations and acquittal in criminal court. Risk assessment and issues of jurisdiction (EU and non EU).

    Re A (a child) [2013] EWCA Civ 1104: Long running private law dispute. Very high profile case when before the Court of Appeal.

    A Local Authority v R and A (RCJ 2014): Missing children, involves wardship, publicity orders and other Tipstaff orders.

    A Local Authority v A and A (High Court 2014): Public law case involving serious allegations of underage sex, removal of the child from the jurisdiction and serious findings of fact. Also issues of long term placement away from the care of parents who are EU nationals.

    LW (A child) [2014] EWFC B96 & 97: Represented a father in a finding of fact hearing where allegations of serious acquired brain injury were made. Cross-examination of a number of medical experts required including a paediatric neuro-radiologist, ophthalmologist and paediatrician regarding both timing and mechanism of injury. There was a concurrent police investigation.

    A Local Authority v B and B (2013): Represented a mother in proceedings in which her youngest child had died from very serious head injuries. Involved extensive medical evidence and a concurrent police investigation and Crown Court trial. Lead by Jane Crowley QC.

    Re FS (2013): Pennie represented the child in a case involving indecent images and the grooming and abuse of a child connected to the family. There was technical evidence regarding the use of social media and the internet and 1000s of messages. Connected criminal investigation.

    Book BarristerBack to top
  • Public Access

    Pennie is accredited to receive instructions directly from members of the public through the Public Access Scheme.

    Book BarristerBack to top